Wednesday, October 28, 2009

THE CASE FOR SARAH PALIN IN 2012 AND THE BLOOD BATH OF 2010


As I look back at the 2008 election's, One name has always come to mind. Sarah Palin! Looking back at that election and all the politics the liberal marxist left took against her offer's many question's unanswered. Why? why did they attack her with such vicousness?

Which led me back to thoughts of in my opinion our greatest President of all time. Ronald Reagan. Many of you were either very young or not even born when he held the highest office in the land. But he was attacked in very much the same way, daily. But he stood firm against the liberal marxist left and recieved finally from them "respect".

Looking back at Reagan he took the libs to task and beat them at thier own game. Taking repeated attacks after repeated attack he stood firm for the value's he sttod for. "Conservative value's" which took us into some of the best times our country has ever seen. Do you really think Clinton created all that wealth during the 90's? Of course not, in fact Clinton rode those Reagan coat tales all those years. And in the end the Clinton admistration is truly the cause of what trouble we are in today. They "Clinton admistration" are the one's that forced the banks to loan all that money to people who could not afford it.

Now looking at Mrs. Palin, during this last election. Who did the liberal marxist left attack. McCain? No! Obama? certainly not! It was Sarah Palin. With relentless vicousness. Why? Well much like Reagan, They knew what she stands for, "Conservatism" Small Government, which means less government, less taxes to fund the liberal left entitlements they give to the poor to keep them elected. Strong military, which keeps our country safe and soverign. And a free market with less government regulation. Things like this that the liberal left marxist don't believe in. Why? because they are sick, sick in the head. They truly have a disease by which there is no cure.

Now during these attacks on Mrs. Palin I told my self right away. "There is something totally Right with this women". And I was right. She is the real deal, She is truly the only one I see which has stuck with her value's no matter the cost. As McCain first turned her loose, his ratings skyrocketed. Well good old McCain didn't like the attention she was getting, Too much ego I guess. And being the true lib repub that McCain is he pulled her back. And what happened, poll numbers went down, the conservative vote stayed home again. And they lost. Fact of the matter is 40% of America is conservative, 36% is moderate, and 20% are liberal left marxist's sick in the head diseased wacko's.

The Conservatives has had no one to vote for. And for this reason the 2 Bush election's were so close, and we lost this last election. Conservatives hasn't had anyone to vote for. so they stay home, or in frustration write in someone. It happened where I live in Salt Lake county. Alot of people wrote in Romney. And therefore Obama won in Salt Lake county. But of course lost the state, we are the redest state in the union don't you know. :)

If Palin runs and we get behind her as a true grass roots movement. She will win! No doubt in my mind. The liberal media is now discredited and thier ratings are dropping of the chart's. So now one who has half a brain will listen to them. And Obama and the liberal left marxist's are digging thier own grave as we speak. "Palin 2012!"

Now to something much closer than 2012, 2010 or the up coming blood bath as I am describing it. Now the liberal left marxist media will not rport on this but the numbers are in and it does not look good for the Dems in 2010. In fact it looks very dissmal. But don't jump for joy just yet. The GOP has alot of work to do. And if they don't do the right thing many of them will be out also. So GOP pull your heads out and get back to our conservative value's and do it fast. If we want a country left, we need to fight. And fight hard! And if you don't, you will get what you deserve. A country taht is like France or some other Euro trash country. With no incentive to achieve or accomplish. America will be no more.

"THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COLLAPSE"


The commercial real estae collapse has already begun. And no one has been talking about it. Why? Why haven't the banks been lending money like they should since the Obama administration gave them all our tax dollars to do so? COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE! That's why.

When we look at the financial issues that face us today, the collapsing dollar, money not being lent to small business to create more jobs. Etc etc etc. it is as if this administration is purposely creating this situation to become worse and worse. Why? Well in the sound words of Obama's right hand man Rham Emmanuel. "We should never let a crisis situation go to waste". What? Are you kidding me? You are going to let most of America go down the tubes so you can push you Socialist agenda? And the answer is yes, that is exactly what they purpose to do.

The commerial real estate market has collapsed, which will make this situation much much worse. I have spoken to key financial people in the banking system, and this commercial real estate situation used to be a 10 minute part of thier meetings. Now, it's all they talk about.

The largest mall owner filed for bankruptcy last February. They own 200 malls. strip malls are becoming more empty by the day. The fact is the Obama admistration never lets a good crisis go to waste. With less business's opening, banks holding on to the money they have knowing what is coming. it leaves us average Joe's out in the breeze at the mercy of these radical socialist marxist's. What do we do? Vote them out in 2010. if we still have a country by that time. (Go to link below)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT2T2T83_y0&feature=related

The Collapsing Dollar


Posted by Bruce Ramsey THE SEATTLE TIMES


I see in the Financial Times that the Southeast Asian central banks are supporting the U.S. dollar, since our Treasury is not. A cheaper dollar is good news for U.S. exporters, but it is not so good for American consumers. We are paid in dollars. When dollars shrink, our pay shrinks. The collapsing dollar makes most of us poorer.

It is easy enough to find reasons why investors are dumping dollars. In the bailout, the Federal Reserve has created too many dollars. Take a look at this chart,(LINK BELOW) from the St. Louis Fed. Note how the blue line jumps at the far right of the diagram. That's the past 12 months. It is a flood of liquidity. Its consequences cannot be good for the value of the dollar.

Part of the story is interest rates. They are at rock-bottom, which does not make America an attractive place for investors to park their money. And being at rock-bottom implies that the next substantial move will be upward, which will reduce the value of all long-term fixed-rate dollar bonds, including Treasury bonds held by foreigners and foreign central banks.

The U.S. "bailout" and "stimulus" experiments will have to end. We're going to have inflation. In order to fight it, and in order to defend the international value of the dollar, the Fed will have to put up interest rates. Probably it won't begin it this year, but something like that is coming. It will not be popular.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/AMBNS

Monday, October 26, 2009

Bernanke's trillion-dollar decision


By EAMON JAVERS

The biggest decision of the economic recovery will be made in the next six months, and Barack Obama will have almost nothing to do with it.

Forget the debate over TARP, and never mind the questions about a second stimulus. This decision is about when to pull out $1 trillion that’s propping up the U.S. banking system. And it will be Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his Fed colleagues who make the call.


That’s hard enough for a White House that knows its political fortunes rise and fall with the economy.
What’s worse is that Bernanke and Obama – like many presidents and Fed chairmen past – won’t necessarily have the same goals for this trillion-dollar decision.
Fed chiefs worry about inflation. Bernanke wants to take the money out quickly enough to prevent the economy from overheating and causing a jump in prices that strangles growth. But move too fast, and the economic recovery runs out of fuel.
Presidents worry about jobs. Obama probably wouldn’t mind a little overheating, say, next summer – when voters are starting to make up their minds about the 2010 congressional elections, and he hopes the economy can shake the 10-percent unemployment rate doldrums.
“Any chairman of the Fed will do what’s right for the country, not what’s right for the administration,” said Ernest Patrikis, a partner at the law firm White & Case who spent 30 years at the New York Fed. “That’s his job – that’s why he’s apolitical.”
“The exit will be so difficult,” said economist Joseph Brusuelas of Moody’s Economy.com. “Bernanke wants to engineer a recovery that does not include inflation. Obama wants a more robust recovery and like many political actors may be willing to forgo a little inflation for a little more employment.”
The White House is already worried that jobs won’t be coming back fast enough next year, Fed or no Fed.
Obama economic adviser Christina Romer warned a congressional panel Thursday that the jobs picture will remain “painfully weak” through 2010, with a seriously elevated unemployment rate for another year.
So all the White House can do is watch and wait, and hope it doesn’t pay a political price for any missteps by Fed officials they can’t control.
“It’s a dicey thing to do, and they know it,” said Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the ranking member on the Senate Banking Committee. “They have to be careful.”
The Fed’s moves are shrouded in secrecy, their prerogative to move the levers of the economy closely guarded – so much so that there’s been a recent a rise in populist anger about this all-powerful agency that exists largely outside the democratic process.
But because the Fed is an independent agency, it’s even considered bad form for a president to talk much about it – and indeed, the White House refused to comment for this story.
Last fall, the Fed injected $ 1 trillion-plus into the nation’s banking system – at times, by providing financial institutions with cash to cover their losses as the global meltdown spread. Now Fed officials are already talking about the need to withdraw the funds injected into the economy during the darkest days of the crisis, moves that are credited with largely saving the United States from plummeting into an economic depression.
“Given the highly unusual economic and financial circumstances, judging when the time is appropriate to remove policy accommodation, and then calibrating that removal, will be challenging,” said Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Donald Kohn in a speech to the Cato Institute on Sept. 30. “Still, we need to be ready to take the necessary actions when the time comes, and we will be.”
Translation: “policy accommodation” is the cash, and “the necessary actions” are the decision to ease it out of the economy.”

And is the Fed prepared to the pull the trigger? “We will be” seems to cover it.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28677.html

Friday, October 23, 2009

White House Tactics Go Too Far

Do you think this White House is still not socialist? Communist? Totalitarian? Well if your still of that opinion, I truly pray for you. Yesterday in a effort to block Fox news out of the ability to interview the job Czar Ken Feinberg. You know the guy that is controlling what these Executives that work for companies that recieved TARP money get paid. And new information has come out that in his power he will be able to control other companies that didn't recieve TARP money, he will be able to control what they get paid also. (Sound Socialist yet?)

But any way the White House said they would not allow Fox to do any interview with Ken Feinberg. So the other media station's CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN etc. stood up to the White House and said NO! If Fox is not going to be able to do interviews then we are out also. Has the liberal media finally woke up? Time will tell.

But here is a link to a great article by Charles Krauthammer on the subject.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/23/white_house_tactics_go_too_far.html

Thursday, October 22, 2009

THE SECOND CASE AGAINST GOVERNMENT RUN HELATH CARE

This is my second case against GOV run helath care. Read this statistic and then go to link and read the crazy way the GOV runs medicare. INSANE!!!!!

Richard W. Fisher, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas has remarked that in order to "cover the unfunded liability" for the Medicare program today over an infinite time horizon, "you would be stuck with an $85.6 trillion bill" which is "more than six times the annual output of the entire U.S. economy", and noted that "Medicare was a pay-as-you-go program from the very beginning."[43]




The present value of unfunded obligations under all parts of Medicare during FY 2007 over a 75-year forecast horizon is approximately $34.0 trillion. In other words, this amount would have to be set aside today such that the principal and interest would cover the shortfall over the next 75 years.[44]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_(United_States)#Out-of-pocket_costs

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

THE CASE AGAINST NATIONAL RUN INSURANCE"THE BIG DUPE"

I have been fuming about this whole GOV. run health care plan. So I decided to make a case against it. And here it is. I started to look at one National Insurance program, "National Flood Insurance" run by FEMA. Now looking into this I have learned this, there use to be 13 private insurance companies that provided flood insurance. Do you know how many there are today? 1, that's right 1. The United staes Government. So if you need flood insurance guess where you have to buy it? So did the GOV. create competition? No they took the insurance companies completly out. Does this sound familiar yet?

So now, this great GOV> run program works like this. You pay per month say $33 for a $100,000 policy. Now here is where it gets good. If you get flooded out, they pay you $100,000 in the form of a loan, that's right a loan. At 4% interest(out of the goodness of there hearts) they give you a great rate at 4%. And you pay it back for 30 years. Now let's say you don't want to go thru taht ordeal again and want to move out of the area with that money and build a new house. "NOPE" says the federal GOV. you have to rebuild on a flood plain on your existing property. So here is where it gets really good. So these property owners rebuild and do what with thier property? They rent it out to low income people. And what's the significance to this? Well because they rent out thier new house to low income people, and it gets flooded again. Well because the people renting are low income the federal GOV loans out again to rebuild at a low interest rate. And all these area's that get flooded year after year after year, are all low income rental area's. Don't believe me? Look it up, it's all true.

So how well does this GOV run insurance program do? Well it is $400 million doallars in the hole and it takes $200 million of our tax dollars every year to help those rebuild thier rental properties. So really they are $600 million in the hole every year. But why can't it be deficit nuetral Like Pelosi says this new GOV run helath care paln will be? People pay premiums to pay for this so called "insurance" and it can't sustain itself? What gives? I will tell you why, it's run by the GOV. Name one thing the GOV. runs well? Name one.

So this is my question? DO YOU REALLY WANT THE GOV RUNNING HEALTH CARE?

SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

Very Touching, A must see video. My son is doing his eagle scout project, and has chosen to do 50 care packages for our troops over sea's. USA!  USA!  USA!!  I love those soldiers.

http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=10845419&referralPlaylistId=playlist

"CODE PINK" GIVE ME A BREAK!

Code Pink gets thier ass kicked in this video. It is Awesome!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g3MfVrZ4jA

7 LIES OF OBAMA

This administration is unbeliveable. The more and more I hear these socialist, marxist idea's the more I believe he "Obama" is a socialist, marixist, communist etc. etc. If we don't stand up and take our country back from these radicals. What will you tell your grandchildren when they ask "What happened?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0

RONALD REAGAN

Freedom


A people free to choose will always choose peace.

Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today’s world do not have.

Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.

Democracy is worth dying for, because it’s the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man.

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls topped by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders.

RONALD REAGAN